Time, Memory, and The Psychology of Immersive Experiences
Think about the last experience that truly absorbed you. Not one that was pleasant, or entertaining, or even fun in the conventional sense. There one where you lost yourself. Where the boundaries between you and the experience became, for a sustained stretch of time, difficult to locate.
Maybe it was a novel that made you miss your subway stop. A live concert where you forgot you had a body. A conversation, face to face, so engrossing that when you finally looked at your phone, an hour and a half had somehow passed.
These immersive experiences are rarer than they should be. And they are worth understanding.
We spend our waking lives in a continuous stream of subjective experience. This is all we ever really have: the phenomenological texture of being somewhere, doing something, moment to moment. The philosopher Jon Kabat-Zinn distilled this with disarming simplicity: wherever you go, there you are. You can't outsource the experience of being alive. You're always, irreducibly, in it.
And yet, much of modern life is structured around minimizing that very experience. The digital world, for all its extraordinary utility, is instrumental by nature. It's a spectacular place to get things done. Email replaced hand-written letters. Google Maps literally gets you from A to B. Social media lets you broadcast a thought to thousands of people in seconds. These are tools of remarkable efficiency, and efficiency is precisely the point. The digital world is optimized for throughput, not for the quality of the psychological experience itself. It’s a place to get things done; not a place to be.
Much of the critique of digital platforms has focused on what they inflict: the anxiety, the social comparison, the doomscrolling. Less attention has been paid to what they deny us. What the digital world takes away, quietly and consistently, is the capacity for immersive experience. Immersion requires certain psychological conditions that digital environments are structurally unable to provide.
So what, exactly, makes an experience immersive? And why are these experiences so psychologically valuable?
What Makes an Experience Immersive
Immersive experiences are distinct in two fundamental ways. First, they alter our relationship to time. Second, they engross us to the point where we stop entertaining the counterfactual. Both of these deserve unpacking, because together they explain why immersion feels so different from ordinary experience, and why it's so difficult to achieve in a digital context.
Immersive Experience Alters The Psychology of Time
As we’ve before, time itself may march forward at a steady pace, but our psychological experience of time is far more elastic. The Germans have a beautiful word for this: Eigenzeit, roughly translated as "one's own time," the time inherent in a given process. A plant growing has its Eigenzeit. So does a person stuck in a waiting room, and an athlete in a flow state.
What determines the texture of our Eigenzeit is, in large part, how deeply our working memory is engaged. Working memory is the brain's capacity to hold information in mind while simultaneously integrating it with what came before and what might come next. When you're watching a murder mystery and a revelation at minute 87 sends you mentally racing back to a scene from minute 12, that's working memory in action. You're not just receiving information. You're actively engaging with it, weaving it into a larger, unfolding structure.
Neuroscience research has shown that this kind of processing engages what are called temporal response windows: hierarchically organized systems in the brain that track information over different timescales. Quick, sensory experiences (on the order of seconds) are processed in the brain's primary sensory regions. But slower, more drawn-out experiences, unfolding over minutes or hours, recruit higher-order regions like the temporal-parietal junction and medial prefrontal cortex. These are areas associated with meaning-making, narrative comprehension, and self-relevant thought.
Immersive experiences engage these longer temporal response windows. They require us to hold more information, for longer, and to integrate it across time. This is what gives them their psychological thickness. Time doesn't just pass during an immersive experience. It accumulates.
This stands in stark contrast to what happens during fast-paced digital media consumption. The average TikTok video is 40 to 50 seconds long. Each clip is self-contained, requiring no integration with what came before. No matter how long you watch, there's no progressive building of meaning, no recruitment of the brain's longer temporal response windows. The experience is purely sensory and immediate. It is, in a very real neurological sense, thin.
Immersive Experiences Subdue our Counterfactual Thinking
The second hallmark of immersive experience is what it does to counterfactual thinking. Counterfactual thinking is our tendency to compare our current situation with what else we could be doing or experiencing. Research on this is striking. When participants sit at a dinner table with a smartphone resting face-down in front of them, they enjoy their conversations less and report feeling more distracted. They don't need to pick the phone up. Its mere presence is enough to trigger the thought: what might I be missing?
The smartphone represents an almost infinite range of possible experiences. An important text, a breaking news story, a notification from any number of apps. This kind of ambient counterfactual thinking is, psychologically speaking, kryptonite for presence. It fractures our attention and dilutes the experience in front of us.
Immersive experiences are powerful precisely because they override this. When you're deep into a great novel or captivated by a live performance, the counterfactual goes quiet. You're not wondering what else you could be doing, because the current experience has fully claimed your cognitive resources. There's nothing left over for the wandering "what if." The experience doesn't just compete with the counterfactual. Instead, it renders it irrelevant.
Why Immersive Experiences Are So Memorable
There's a third dimension to immersion that's worth noting: immersive experiences tend to be deeply memorable. And this isn't incidental. It follows directly from what we know about how memories are formed.
Memory consolidation, the process by which the brain converts an experience into a lasting memory, requires something that the modern digital environment is uniquely bad at providing: downtime. Think of it like physical exercise. The workout itself is important, but it's the rest and recovery afterwards that produces the actual gains. The brain works the same way. After a meaningful experience, it needs time, free from interference, to lay that experience down into long-term memory.
This is where the concept of proactive interference becomes relevant. New experiences that arrive immediately after an older one interfere with the memory formation of the first. In classic experiments, participants who were given additional, similar material to learn right after the first set performed significantly worse at recalling the original. The second experience disrupted the consolidation of the first.
On TikTok, as we’ve seen, proactive interference isn't a bug. It's the architecture. Every 45 seconds, a new, highly stimulating, emotionally charged piece of content arrives, immediately overwriting whatever trace the last one might have left. The result is an experience that, paradoxically, feels like it flies by in the moment and leaves almost nothing behind in memory. It's psychologically weightless.
Immersive experiences work differently. Because they unfold over longer periods, engaging working memory and the brain's higher-order processing regions, they produce memories that are rich and durable. A two-hour film, a live concert, a long dinner conversation: these don't just feel meaningful in the moment. They persist as an enduring memory, intertwined with our existing mental schema.
The Scarcity of Psychological Immersion
We live in an era of digital abundance, where any song, any video, any piece of content is available at our fingertips. And yet, research suggests that this abundance is associated not with fulfillment but with restlessness. The more options we have, the harder it becomes to commit to any single one. And without commitment, there is no immersion.
The psychology here is clear: immersive experience requires a willingness to stay. To weather the small fluctuations of boredom that inevitably arise, rather than swiping to the next thing. Research from the University of Toronto has shown that participants who watched a single, uninterrupted ten-minute video reported greater enjoyment and a deeper sense of meaning than those who could switch between shorter clips. The switchers, despite having more choice, felt more bored.
This is the central paradox. The very tools we use to stave off boredom are, in fact, producing it. And the experiences we might dismiss as too slow, too long, or too demanding are precisely the ones capable of delivering what we're actually looking for: the feeling of being fully, unambiguously, there.
Photo by Devon Wilson on Unsplash
References for The Psychology AI Art Perception: The Influence of The Brand
Ahn, W. K., Taylor, E. G., Kato, D., Marsh, J. K., & Bloom, P. (2013). Causal essentialism in kinds. Quarterly journal of experimental psychology, 66(6), 1113-1130.
Bellaiche, L., Shahi, R., Turpin, M. H., Ragnhildstveit, A., Sprockett, S., Barr, N., ... & Seli, P. (2023). Humans versus AI: whether and why we prefer human-created compared to AI-created artwork. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1), 42.
Chiarella, S., Torromino, G., Gagliardi, D., Rossi, D., Babiloni, F., & Cartocci, G. (2022). Investigating the negative bias towards artificial intelligence: Effects of prior assignment of AI-authorship on the aesthetic appreciation of abstract paintings. Computers in Human Behavior, 137, 107406.
Guingrich, R. (March 2024) Interview, personal correspondence via zoom
Johnson, M., & Ghuman, P. (2020). Blindsight: The (mostly) hidden ways marketing reshapes our brains. BenBella Books.
Liu, Y., Mittal, A., Yang, D., & Bruckman, A. (2022). Will AI console me when I lose my pet? Understanding perceptions of AI-mediated email writing. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517731.
Turpin, M., Walker, A., Kara-Yakoubian, M., Gabert, N., Fugelsang, J., & Stolz, J. (2019). Bullshit makes the art grow profounder. Judgment and Decision Making, 14, 658–670.
Wilson, E. A. (2011). Affect and artificial intelligence. University of Washington Press.
