How The Search for Telepathy Changed Neuroscience Forever

An abstract figure of a bearded man, screaming

Strange, inexplicable feelings often accompany life-and-death situations. Face to face with one’s own mortality, people often feel as though time slows down, or that their life flashes before their eyes. Others report feeling extreme clarity and resolution.

On one particular occassion, a strange set of feelings, arising from the grips of mortal danger, changed the field of neuroscience forever. This is how electroencephalography (EEG) was born.

 

In 1892, Hans Berger, a mathematics student at The University of Jena in Germany, enrolled for a year in the cavalry. During a military exercise, he was suddenly thrown off his horse right into the path of a horse-drawn cannon. Lying helplessly on the ground, he stared up at the heavy artillery in sheer terror, inches away from crushing him.

 

At that moment, miles away, his sister had a sudden premonition that something was terribly wrong. The feeling was so intense that she insisted that her father telegram him immediately.

 

Back on the training ground, the quick reflexes of the artillery driver saved Berger's life. He escaped the incident with only a few bruises and quickly recovered. However, his sister's sudden intuition stayed with him long after the event. He could not dismiss the incident as mere coincidence and was convinced there must be a hidden science to uncover. He quickly became engulfed with the concept of telepathy, and it became the sole focus of his scientific career. 


Originally a mathematics student, Berger wanted to be an astronomer. But after the incident, he returned to Jena and switched to medicine and physiology. He worked tirelessly to uncover the science behind these mysterious telepathic forces, an obsession that took him directly to the cutting edge of neuroscience.

From Telepathy to Neuroscience

It's hard to imagine a more forlorn pursuit than trying to uncover the "science" of telepathy. A century later, the evidence is clear that no such ability exists. There’s ample confidence in this assertion since it’s a simple question to test: If telepathy is possible, people should be able to reliably communicate across large distances with the simple power of their minds.

 

Countless experiments have put that idea to the test with variations of the following setup: Give person A a number between 1 and 100, and instruct them to try and telepathically communicate that number to person B the next room over. The findings are consistent. Even if both participants are ardent believers, their guesses are still no greater than chance.

 

For Berger, however, his investigations lead to a scientific breakthrough. He wasn't interested in telepathy per se, and he never tried to replicate his sister's experience. Instead, he simply assumed that the phenomenon existed and wanted to deeper into the mechanisms that allow it to transpire. As he described, his dedication was to "the search for the correlation between objective activity in the brain and subjective psychic phenomena." He was convinced that there must be a hidden force emitted from the brain.

 

And on this specific point, he was right. 

 

After decades of toil, in 1924, Berger provided the first-ever recording from electroencephalography (EEG). EEG measures the electrical activity that emits from the scalp, which is a proxy for the underlying neural activity, and which is, in turn, a proxy for a person's mental activity.

 

His goal was to find the connection between "physical brain activity" and "subjective psychic phenomena", and this was an absolute bullseye. EEG displays that connection in the most direct way possible. 


The invention of EEG was nothing short of a neuroscientific breakthrough. By the 1930s, medical practitioners all over the US and Europe employed EEG for medical diagnoses, especially for epilepsy and sleep disorders.

 

EEG also revolutionized the budding science of the brain. It provided an unprecedented window into human nature not otherwise possible.

Applications of EEG for Studying Neuroscience

Before EEG, learning about the brain was a relatively crude affair. The bulk of data came from neuropsychology - a sub-field dedicated to studying patients who have suffered a brain injury. The basic idea is to treat neural disassociations as a window into the brain's specialization: The brain is healthy and capable of the full range of functions. Then there was damage to region A, and now the person can't do function X. Therefore, region A must somehow be involved in producing function X.

 

This is not to say that neuropsychology didn't contribute to the field. For example, the neuropsychologist Paul Broca made considerable contributions to the neuroscience of language. Much of this came from studying a patient who had lost the ability to speak despite still being very intelligent and fully lucid. He became known as "Patient Tam", as that was the only syllable he could muster when trying to communicate. When he died, his autopsy revealed a large lesion in the left frontal lobe, now called "Broca's Area", and is understood today as being the critical region for language production.

 

Much of the foundational understanding about the neural basis of functions like memory, decision making, and perception all came from studying patients. But it was a slow, grueling process. Moreover, because the object of study is predicated on naturally occurring injuries, your insights were limited to whatever poor fortunate befell your patients. These injuries are also not always neat and tidy, making it difficult to understand what specific damage produced what specific deficit.

 

To study the brain was to wait around for something unfortunate to happen to someone's brain. And then hoping these poor souls found their way to your lab so you could study their unique deficits. EEG changed all of that. 

A Closer Look at EEG: Waveforms and ERPs

For the first time, there was a direct window into the fully functioning brain. Instead of studying what happens when certain functions are disrupted, scientists could now investigate the functions themselves.

 

Scientists quickly discovered that the brain produces broad patterns of activity, which correspond to a very general state of mind. These are called "waveforms". Berger himself ran experiments identifying alpha wave activity, neural oscillations in the frequency range of 8–12 Hz, that are apparent when one's eyes are closed or in a wakeful relaxation state. These are often called "Berger waves".

 

Later, neuroscientists would discover a whole host of waveform activity. This includes delta waves (4 Hz) associated with slow-wave sleep, Theta waves (4 Hz - 7 Hz) associated with arousal, drowsiness, and in some cases, meditation, and Beta Waves (13 Hz - 30 Hz) most present during simple motor behavior and analytical thinking, and more.

 

Berger's initial investigations paved the way for a broad understanding of brain pattern activity that still serves as the foundation for modern neuroscience.

 

Of course, EEG is not without its drawbacks. Given that it's a direct measure from the brain's surface, EEG is limited in that it can only reliably measure activity from the outer few millimeters of the brain, known as the cortex. It can't examine activity in the brain much deeper than that. It's also not an ideal technology to study where exactly something happens along the cortex. You can see whether this occurs on the left or right side of the brain and in which general part of what lobe, but you can't get much more specific than that. We're talking inches, not millimeters.  

 

But what EEG loses in spatial resolution, it makes up for in it's temporal resolution. That is, it's not great at finding where something happens in the brain, but it's superb at identifying when things happen. Down to the millisecond. For this reason, EEG responses can be timed to specific events in a methodology called event-related potentials (ERPs).

 

ERPs tell us about the brain's reaction to something very specific. For example, one common use is for measuring the responses to individual words, by measuring a pattern of brain activity known as the n400 response. The n400 is often associated with psychological surprise. But more accurately, its function is tied to semantic retrieval: the easier it is to retrieve a word's meaning, the lower the n400 response is. Conversely, the harder it is for the brain to recover the word's meaning, the stronger the n400 response. 

 

So when you have a sentence like:

 

"I went to the store to buy some ___________", the n400 response to the word "groceries" here will be much lower than the n400 response to "gorilla". Since you're not likely to expect the latter, it's much more difficult to retrieve it, given the preceding sentence.

 

Given this exceptional timing (which far exceeds that of other modern techniques such as fMRI), EEG is a powerful tool for studying language. And when it comes to examining quick processing in the cortex, it remains unrivaled. 

Final Thoughts on Hans Berger, Telepathy and Neuroscience

Since Berger's day, EEG technology has vastly improved, and analyzing its data has become much more sophisticated. But the basic technology - measuring brain activity from the scalp with electrodes - remains hugely influential. It was a revolutionary instrument for its time, and remains a powerful tool in modern neuroscience. It's an especially crucial tool for studying consumer psychology, and lightweight mobile versions are also heavily used in experiential marketing.

 

While he employed an empirical methodology to probe his area of inquiry, his ultimate motivation was pure, inexplicable emotion. His central research question - the origins of telepathy - was rife with assumptions that went utterly unquestioned. He was trying to uncover the scientific basis of something that doesn't exist.

 

Before his life-changing brush with telepathy, Berger fancied himself an astronomer. We'll never know what contributions he may have made to that field, and they have been noteworthy. But as it turned out, he became a neuroscientist enamored with psychic forces.


In all its irrational glory, this obsession ultimately drove a scientific breakthrough. And in doing so, changed neuroscience forever.

Photo by Alex Hockett on Unsplash


About the author

Matt Johnson, PhD is a researcher, writer, and consumer neuroscientist focusing on the application of psychology to branding. He is the author of the best-selling consumer psychology book Blindsight, and Branding That Means Business (Economist Books, Fall 2022). Contact Matt for speaking engagements, opportunities to collaborate, or just to say hello


References for “How The Search for Telepathy Changed Neuroscience Forever”

Broca, P (1861). “Remarks on the Seat of the Faculty of Articulated Language, Following an Observation of Aphemia (Loss of Speech)” Archived 17 January 2001 at the Wayback Machine. Bulletin de la Société Anatomique, Vol. 6, (1861), 330–357

Berger, H. (1940), Psyche, 6

Millet D. (2002), "The Origins of EEG" International Society for the History of the Neurosciences (ISHN)

Tudor, M.; Tudor, L.; Tudor, K. I. (2005). "Hans Berger (1873-1941)--the history of electroencephalography". Acta Medica Croatica : Casopis Hravatske Akademije Medicinskih Znanosti. 59 (4): 307–13. PMID 16334737.

Previous
Previous

What Do Death Rituals Reveal About Social Neuroscience?

Next
Next

What Neuroscience Teaches Us About Human Nature